The media ran with the story of Revolve Festival being compared to Fyre Festival 2.0. In the short term, it does not help the company’s brand; however, the story has died down and has minimal impact on its intrinsic value.

I am an investor in Revolve. Group. I have never bought anything on their website and am nothing close to a social media influencer. I do not even have a Tiktok account. Revolve Festival’s negative attention ma worried me as an investor; however, the story is sensationalized as a non-story disguised as a major headline.

Frye Festival was a fraudulent festival. It was a con in the Bahamas where people spent between $1,000 and $12,000 on tickets for a fake event. The organizer of the event is now in prison.

The Revolve Festival is an actual invite-only event that was launched in 2015. People had to wait in long lines for shuttle buses and were stuck in the heat with no food or water. Those that attended the festival had a great time, but the negative criticism is mainly from those that waited and never got in.

I do not mean to point out the obvious, but any major event with high demand will see long wait times. The people that get preferential treatment are the super influencers and A-List Celebrities.

I am reminded of the song “That’s Life,” which Frank Sinatra made famous in 1966.

Revolve made a logistical error in inviting too many influencers for an exclusive invite-only event. They could have done better, but the headlines sound like a complete overreaction to what actually happened. Micro-influencers are complaining that they were treated like commoners.

Being a non-expert on this subject matter, I looked for experts’ opinions on the subject matter. From blogger Elise Purdon:

Revolve Fest has become one of the biggest and most important networking opportunities for influencers, especially smaller ones, every year, and many are dying to get in to advance their careers. Some of their reactions were likely driven by career anxiety of missing the festival and thus a huge opportunity, rather than being sweaty and bored. “The real problem is that Revolve has such a power over the industry that people are willing to fight and shove and stand all day in the desert to try and get on a bus to get into this thing where they aren’t even getting paid to create free advertising,” she said. (Many influencers receive store credit in exchange for posting about the invite-only event, according to reports).

Stephanie McNeal’s newsletter

Revolve Festival is the creme de la creme event for influencer marketing, explaining the crazy demand they get. The festival has become more prominent than the actual festival, Coachella. They get more likes and impressions than H&M, Coachella’s official partner. Revolve has been running circles around global brands that bring in billions every year. The influencers complaining are likely the same people that would pay $10,000 or more to attend this festival if they could be treated like Kim Kardashian or Kendall Jenner.

Revolve Festival is a signal of Revolve entering the slope of its growth S-Curve. Revolve is as much of a clothing company as Tesla is a car company. They have an army of social media influencers who will get bigger and stronger. The company is multiplying, and the overall sector is expanding as well. For an investor, that’s what you want to see.

I respect social media influencers because it takes tremendous talent and hard work to amass millions of followers. They are hungry entrepreneurs trying to build their careers. Influencers are the lifeblood of Revolve and are necessary for their future growth. I compare the importance of influencers similar to software engineers for companies like Google, Meta, Tencent, etc. Tech companies need talented software engineers to grow their companies. They get paid a lot because there is such a low supply of them on the job market. The best influencers actually make as much money as the best software engineers, which, you can argue, makes them more valuable.

The negative headlines will likely die down. Disgruntled engineers leave tech companies every day, so Revolve can’t please all their influencers. There is no call for a boycott or cancel Revolve Festival because this story is a non-story. This will do nothing to stop the demand for events like this. Revolve understands the value of influencers and provides them attractive compensation packages. They are one of the few companies that pay influencers like tech companies pay software engineers. Until companies like Macy’s and Nordstrom adopt this model, Revolve will continue to take their lunches as they have been doing for the past 5 years. The cost of paying influencers will be significantly higher in the future. Revolve is paying discounted rates for influencer marketing, leading to stellar revenue growth. By the time traditional retailers react and Revolve groups lose their moat, they could be a mega fashion conglomerate. The growth train has started, and it will be hard to stop.

Elon Musk has offered $43 billion to buy Twitter, a platform on which he has over 80 million followers.

My initial thoughts: Twitter the application is still an important social networking platform for breaking news and communicating with people. As an investment? It is a dumpster fire.

Twitter was one of the first stocks I have ever bought. The stock price I bought was under $20. My reasoning was that it is still a great product, and management would eventually have a plan to fix its stagnating user growth and inconsistent revenue growth. Most importantly, Donald Trump becoming the 45th President of the United States would send the stock soaring. He would end up sending almost 24,000 tweets as President.

Despite the attention Trump gave Twitter, it did not solve its lagging user growth issue. I ended up selling my shares of Twitter for around $38-40 and concluded the company was not a good long-term investment anymore.

My hypothesis on successful social networking sites is that they have a 5-10 year runway of max popularity and user growth. Each generation wants its own space, as it seems naive to think that those in their 20s will hang out on the same app as those in their 30s, 40s, 50s, etc. The principles of managing a networking site are not much different than running a big social club or gathering place. As the event organizer, it is your job to get as many people to attend and monetize each attendee. There is a ton of competition, so the organizer needs to keep attracting new people.

Twitter missed its best opportunity to generate revenue and users from 2010 to 2020. Facebook became a powerhouse through the network effect, and Twitter failed to capitalize when its window was open. Things like Tip Jar, Super Follows, and Ticketed Spaces were good ideas when Snapchat and Tiktok were not even a thing, but the landscape today in social networking is more competitive and challenging.

From an investment standpoint, Twitter is the Ben Simmons of stocks. Stephen A Smith has stated, “Ben Simmons is a jump shot away from being the second coming of Lebron James.” No matter how talented and good a player Simmons is, there is no reason to guard him if he refuses or is afraid to shoot 3-pointers. A starting guard in the NBA should make at least 100-200 3-point attempts in an entire season. Simmons, in his career, has only attempted 34 3-pointers his entire career! Simmons is a talented people player but does not attempt outside shots even when unguarded. Twitter is an influential company that many people know about but is not widely profitable or used.

Elon Musk is in for a bad time.

I’m not sure he’s prepared to take on a couple PhDs, a few MBAs, and a Baroness who use Twitter once a year (to reset their passwords) and collectively own 77 shares of the company. pic.twitter.com/sJmKwHbzVh

— Chris Bakke (@ChrisJBakke) April 16, 2022

Twitter is a conundrum whose best days are behind them. It is a rudderless ship. Who exactly runs them? The new CEO does not even own 1% of Twitter shares. They continuously fail, and I see only three options left:

Elon Musk buys Twitter and takes them private.

Twitter employees do not want him, the Twitter board does not want him, and the government will do everything to nix this deal. Making Twitter a pro-free speech platform sounds good from a constitutional theoretical perspective, but in reality, it is something that scares politicians. When you ask Americans broad questions like if freedom of speech should be protected or if people can express unpopular opinions, you have a consensus. When you ask more specific questions, like should people express anti-COVID-19 information or if Neo-Nazis should be allowed to march in a town with a majority Jewish population, you start getting polarization and divergence.

Twitter gets bought out by another company.

Meta and Google are dealing with their own antitrust issues, so adding Twitter would be a headache. The Federal Trade Commission approving Meta or Google acquiring Twitter is more likely than Elon Musk buying them. Disney, PayPal, Microsoft, Salesforce, Netflix, and Oracle, could all be potential buyers. This would be the best-case scenario for a tech giant or white knight to come in and take over. However, I doubt any company would want to pay more than the $43 billion Musk offered.

Remain a public company.

Twitter keeps the status quo, with little insider ownership and lofty goals likely never met. Sure, there is a lot of upside potential, but the problems in 2016 are the same today.

Twitter itself is one giant ecosystem. Compared with Meta Platforms, a more extensive ecosystem with other ecosystems interconnected. You can argue that Facebook is more dated than Twitter, but Facebook is just one facet of Meta Platforms. Look at Facebook as the Capital of Meta. You have Instagram, Whatsapp, and Oculus VR. These are the cities that make up a giant state in Meta. Here is the entire list of companies that Meta has acquired. While Facebook has grown where it is now only one aspect of Meta, Twitter is just…… Twitter.

When I was a Twitter shareholder, I had an underlining suspicion that management was incompetent and void of leadership. Twitter could have been a tech giant, but the company has languished. It is an aging platform with medium growth potential. Under the proper guidance, it could be a nice add on to a parent company (think when Louis Vuitton acquired Tiffany); however, its value has significantly declined since its prime.

Meta is not the most innovative or coolest tech company anymore; however, they are the most influential. They have billions of people in their sphere with a war chest of data and cash at their disposal. The leadership team at Meta operates at extremely high efficiency, which will likely lead to them becoming more profitable and bigger.

In 2017 they copied Snapchat Stories with Facebook and Instagram Stories. Reels is a copy and paste of TikTok. Before Reels, Meta launched Lasso, the original TikTok clone. This is what behemoth tech companies like Meta do. Encourage people to use its apps with new features and see what they like and dislike. They will experiment with making the app better until they kill their competition.

This is why Meta is a superior investment compared to Twitter. They are already aggressively focused on the future and have a giant customer pool at their disposal. The evolution of how we communicate via technology has evolved from text, photos, video, and eventually, the Metaverse.

Meta has many failed projects that never worked out, but like in investing, their big winners overcompensate for their many losers. Whatever their version of the Metaverse is, it will likely be big and profitable. Knowing the stock price (NASDAQ: FB) is down nearly 50% from its peak. Knowing this is not a very friendly environment with rising interest rates and supply chain issues. I see Meta as still being massively undervalued. At the same time, Twitter is stuck in a ditch, waiting for someone to save them from years of mismanagement.

President Joe Biden extended the pause on student-loan payments for a fourth time, through August 31.

I disagree with this decision because it isn’t needed at this moment. The majority of student loan debt is held by the wealthy and upper class. These pandemic pauses are indirectly benefiting people that do not need relief.

Per Marc Goldwein of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, doctors and lawyers are getting most of the relief, while those with only bachelor’s and associate degrees are receiving crumbs.

We’ve already cancelled $50,000 of debt… for doctors https://t.co/ypPQoB1OUP pic.twitter.com/RpOkwwFBsl

— Marc Goldwein (@MarcGoldwein) April 6, 2022

This is not a good idea and an even worse idea is to completely forgive all student loan debt. At this time canceling all student loans would likely increase inflation, and that’s the last thing we need right now.

From Bloomberg:

For the past two years, more than 40 million borrowers have been allowed to forgo making their monthly payments. The vast majority made no payments at all during the pandemic, even though the government set interest rates at zero. This has already cost about $120 billion in lost revenue; the latest extension will cost at least $17 billion more.

I do not believe canceling all student loan debt would spur the economy. For those debtors living paycheck-to-paycheck, it would provide minor short-term relief at best for a much larger issue.

For the high earners who were regularly making payments before the pandemic, I see less logic in forgiving debt for those that have the money and resources to pay it back.

The system needs to change and certain people do need relief with student loan repayment. One simple solution I propose is allowing $1,200 of your student loans to be completely forgiven if you can volunteer 40 hours, which must be completed within 6 months.

The current estimated national value of each volunteer hour Is $28.54. 40 hours x 28.54 is 1,141.6 and you can round that up to 1,200.

My reasoning:

• Provides enough financial incentives and schedule flexibility for high earners and working professionals.
• Create a demand for volunteer work instead of the debtor getting a part-time job or delaying paying their student loans altogether.
• Something digestible that could be approved by Republicans and Democrats.
• Doesn’t take away from other forgiveness programs.
• Less rigid than government-supported programs like AmeriCorps and the Peace Corps.
• Attracts a diverse group of people into a variety of volunteer opportunities.

This is a simple one-time solution that creates immediate economic value and helps with the ongoing labor shortage. It can include more service-oriented volunteer work such as picking up trash or helping at a food bank. It also would be expanded to more freelance-type work like social media consulting, legal aid, tech support, etc. For the doctor or lawyer, this seems like a great opportunity to provide consultation work to residents of a retirement home or help Ukrainian refugees start the asylum process.

If this pilot program received high demand and had proven results, increasing production output in the economy, you can increase the number of hours you could volunteer to forgive your student loans. Overall, I see this as a major win for everyone involved. The number of quality hours produced through this program would outweigh the loss of revenue through canceling $1,200 in student loans.

What criteria do I use when picking the stocks I invest in? I try to keep it super simple. Some investors use complicated formulas and algorithms. I can tell you from experience that isn’t necessary. Being a great investor doesn’t require a high IQ. What great investors tend to share is a strong ability to think and to remain calm under pressure. There are simple steps a long-term investor needs to do to find a truly great stock that does not involve a ton of work or to analyze elaborate valuation methods.

Vision to see them

Courage to buy them

Patience in holding them

So how do you spot a great stock?

4 basic questions an investor must ask themselves:

Can the company do well, or even thrive during a black swan event? Think of buying a house. Would you buy a home that couldn’t withstand a storm or heavy winds? There is a reason why I do not have much invested in airlines or banks. Great companies not only survive but they can prosper during the most uncertain times.

Is there high insider ownership? This is pretty straightforward. Typically high insider ownership signals confidence, but it is kind of expected for the CEO or management to own a lot of the company stock. High insider ownership alone should not be a reason to buy a stock. Some of the best companies are founder-led, and typically have a symbiotic relationship with the company. They try to do the best thing for shareholders, even if that means devaluing their compensation or well-being.

Take the example, of the NFL. Kirk Cousins is one of the top-ten highest-paid quarterbacks in the NFL, and his salary makes up about 16.61% of his team’s cap space in 2023. The problem is there are 52 other roster spots on a team, and the Minnesota Vikings did not even make the playoffs last year. Compare that to Tom Brady, whose salary is about 10.96% of his team’s cap space. You cannot blame Cousins for accepting such a ridiculous contract however, he did his team no favors as his massive salary enriches himself personally but cripples the team’s salary cap.

Is the company financially stable? Key factors include cash available, debt, and free cash flows. Typically the more profitable the company, the more likely it would survive during a recession. There is nothing wrong with investing in a company that isn’t profitable or has weak financials, however, the risk level is much higher. Financially weak companies most likely cannot acquire other businesses or buy back their shares.

Does it have a moat? A moat is a durable competitive advantage. It is a barrier that keeps competitors from breaking through. A few key points about a moat:

• Most companies do not have a moat.
• Moats are sometimes not easily identifiable and are not permanent.
• Some industries are better at creating value than other industries.

Types of Moats:

• Government
• Network effect
• Being the low-cost guy
• Brand name
• High Switching costs

It is important to remember that all humans have biases and preconceptions. Investing is a constant process of inquiry and thought. When any rule or formula becomes a substitute for thought rather than an aid to thinking, it is dangerous and should be discarded. Do not get caught in the precision trap, as precise answers are not realistic or possible when making future assumptions or evaluations.

I read an interesting article about where you grew up, and people’s childhood surroundings determine your ability to navigate later in health. How you invest is very much a product of your upbringing and environment early on in life. How people evaluate stocks can be highly subjective and produce various differing opinions.

I will briefly go over 3 stocks that I would define from a qualitative perspective, as great. I am focusing mainly on the quality of the business and not market prices. These are businesses that can create tremendous value in the years ahead. For long-term investors, it is about being an island of stillness in a flow of treacherous waters. The value you get from your portfolio is created by simply holding quality companies for a long period. We have been conditioned to measure performance by quarterly performance, not business performance. Give these companies time, and I could see them flourish.

Revolve (NYSE: RVLV) Revolve Group is more than just an online fashion retailer. It is an agglomeration of brands, influencers, and designers. Just to give you an example, the influencer here has 1.6m followers on Instagram. Her dress was sold out in all sizes within the same day of the post. This influencer helenowen is also a designer, who has a line with Revolve. This is a win-win situation for all parties involved. When an influencer posts, Revolve makes money as they can create and order products based on real-time demand. The influencer benefits by having a platform to grow and showcase her brand. It is beneficial for super influencers like Helen Owen and Kendall Jenner. It works for nano-influencers. What’s even better is that influencers are essentially a renewable resource so Revolve doesn’t become hostage to one super influencer.

I have stated this many times, but I will repeat, Wall Street is still vastly underestimating this company. The brand is the moat. The brand is so strong, as they have a tight-knit community of influencers, celebrities, and customers. A great founder-led company with impressive growth numbers and already profitable. They can automate and map their inventory in real-time from their technology platform. This model will eventually be copied, but that could be a long time down the road. Revolve will experience exponential growth when its sales model is widely adopted.

• A strong brand ensures recurring customers and inspires loyalty
• Financially stable company – no real estate anchor
• The Total Addressable Market (TAM) is growing
• Not reliant on a specific customer, influencer, or designer.

Palantir (NYSE: PLTR) Very few companies can provide the service that Palantir does. They have an AI/ML infrastructure that makes sense of large data sets. Palantir is misjudged because people do not how to categorize them. This is why share prices have been all over the map. Many great growth companies like Amazon and Facebook, in their early-stage growth, have had similar issues. Was Tesla an automotive company, a technology company, or a pure-play on EV?

So what is it? Is Palantir high-growth tech or an overpriced consulting firm? I have said this before, but Palantir provides solutions to problems that companies do not even know exist yet. Palantir is in many ways the Nikola Jokić of stocks. There is no player in the NBA like Jokić, who was the lowest-draft player to win NBA MVP. On the surface, he looks like an unathletic big man that should ride the bench, but in reality, he is a star that passes like a point guard and can make 3-pointers. No NBA star plays like Jokić at his size (nearly 300 pounds). It is hard to evaluate Palantir because there has never been a company like them before, and their services are unique to the market.

• Risky now because they do not have a broad customer base.
• The Total Addressable Market is massive.
• Saas revenue model from Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) is highly profitable.
• High switching cost is a Moat.

Lemonade (NYSE: LMND) Chris Rock said in an interview with the Breakfast Club that unfunny comedy is a product of comedians who fear being canceled. Being a great comedian requires you to be a risk-taker. The same thing goes with being a great investor. If you do not take any risks, you will have guaranteed mediocre returns. Consider the average fund available to invest in has over 150 stocks, and those companies get turned over every year. Ask yourself, where is the edge in that?

Lemonade is a big-time risk. It is among one of the most hated, ridiculed stocks in the market. There is no timetable for profit however, the opportunity is massive. Right now, Lemonade is like a car halfway built. Evaluating Lemonade’s performance when its products are not rolled out nationwide is a bit shortsighted. Their future flagship product, car insurance, just launched in only their second state, Tennessee, last month!

Lemonade has a TAM, as big as any publicly-traded company. If Lemonade provides a better onboarding experience, offers lower rates, loses less on claims, and payout claims in minutes, it will gain millions of new users. For Lemonade, more users equate to more data points, and their overall network becomes smarter. This creates more efficient underwriting and accurate pricing. The scary thing is that the market for car, home, renters, pet, and life insurance is so big, that they don’t need to overtake State Farm or Geico to experience exponential growth. If they can just take a slice of the overall market share, the stock will be a 1,000% gainer in a decade.

• Powered by AI and using telematics allows Lemonade to undercut its competitor’s prices.
• The suite of products: car, home, renters, pet, and life being offered globally equals a large TAM.
• Potential of a Network Effect if consumers find Lemonade significantly better than its competitors.
• Social impact makes it different from traditional insurance.

“We generally do not enter into business with customers or governments whose positions or actions we consider inconsistent with our mission to support Western liberal democracy and its strategic allies.”

Palantir S-1 Prospectus

On February 24th, Russia invaded Ukraine. As FDR once said, “a date which will live in infamy.” Vladimir Putin is no longer a thuggish dictator, but now a full-fledged war criminal, who will be ostracized from the global community. The global landscape has changed. Everything has changed.

Watching the horrific scenes in Kyiv, I start to realize how lucky I was to be born in a democratic country. All of us have problems, but nothing like that of those that live in an authoritarian country where the meaning of freedom and liberty are much different.

We now have a true declaration of war. This war won’t be fought on the battlefield but in cyberspace. The U.S military is significantly stronger than Russia. When you add the U.S and all of its allies vs Russia, it isn’t even close. Russia knows this but closes the gap with a formidable hacking network where they can inflict massive cyberattacks that can cause large-scale damage.

The recent attack forever changed U.S. relations with Russia and Europe. Preserving western democracy through cybersecurity and focusing on national defense will be a much higher priority for the U.S. and its allies. I see Palantir, a stock that thrives in chaos, as a big beneficiary from the Russia-Ukraine war.

What is Palantir?

The company leverages machine learning and data analysis algorithms to detect unusual or suspicious patterns in large data sets in order to identify, predict, and report conclusions and outcomes. These products and services enable organizations to collect data, process data, analyze data, and use patterns and connections from the analysis to make better operational decisions and predict outcomes.

What is Palantir? Palantir Explained

How does this relate to cybersecurity?

At Palantir, we’re passionate about solving real-world problems. Our software has been used to stop terrorist attacks, develop new medicines, gain an edge in global financial markets, combat child trafficking, and more.

InfoSec at Palantir

How is the company performing?

Palantir expanded its commercial business throughout 2021, with revenue up 34% year over year to $645 million. U.S. commercial revenue alone soared 102% with the customer count jumping 4.7 times to 80. In 2021, government revenue gained 47% to $897 million.

Palantir shares drop more than 15% after earnings

Palantir was founded in 2003 and focused mainly on government contracts. They only recently entered into the commercial space, which makes it the faster-growing segment of their business. Palantir is unique in that they focused on government customers, which is a much more difficult space to grow as a business. Commercial contracts are governed by state law and are much fairer and equal between both parties. Government contracts favor the government for obvious reasons. They have unique powers that a private or publicly-traded business would never have. There is just so much red tape and bureaucracy with government contracts, it becomes an unattractive business model for revenue growth. It makes a lot of sense why Palantir ramped up on hiring sales reps to increase their commercial clientele list.

The invasion changes everything. Government contracts could boom for Palantir. All allies of the U.S. could bolster spending on defense to protect themselves from the Chinese, Russian, and North Korean hacking armies. Germany just recently ramped up its defense spending above 2% of its gross domestic product. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said during a special session of the Bundestag, “it has become clear that we need to invest significantly more in the security of our country, in order to protect our freedom and our democracy.” Cyberwarfare is upon us and cybersecurity has become an urgent need. Companies like Palo Alto Networks, Crowdflare, Crowdstrike could all benefit, but I like Palantir the most because they are not confined to just the cybersecurity space. They analyze complicated data-driven problems and synthesize large data sets in a much more organized way. That market fits into a lot of different industries, which creates a large total addressable market.

Most investors and analysts assume the reason to invest in Palantir is because of their future growth in the commercial space. It has been assumed that government contracts are slowing down. With the recent geopolitical events, maybe Palantir’s government business is just starting to accelerate, which makes the stock price very attractive at these levels. They already have their foot in the door, so if the demand for more government contracts does increase, Palantir can deliver on that addressable need.

If Palantir grows its revenue at an average rate of 20-30% over the following 10 years, the stock is most likely an 8-12 bagger with a market cap of $400-500 billion. If Palantir grows its revenue at an average rate of 30-40% over the following 10 years, its market cap could be closer to $1 trillion. In that ultra bull-case scenario, this stock is a potential 100 bagger, in the same class as Microsoft, Google, and Tesla. With some luck and conviction, I am holding my shares through a shaky and volatile market. I could accept the pain if the stock price went to zero. I could not accept the regret if Palantir became a superstock and I did not own it.

“The best way to predict the future is to create it.”

Abraham Lincoln, 16th president of the United States

“Things are pumping on all cylinders, and we’re a V12; we’ve got a lot of cylinders.” Michael Mente, co-founder, and co-CEO of Revolve.

RVLV is undervalued. It is easily a 100 stock. I see its stock price having a similar trajectory to Lululemon. The stock is misunderstood by Wall Street. Most analysts do not even know what Revolve sells or how they advertise. They are not just a fashion company, they are a cultural brand, which is not priced into the stock price. They have true staying-power which will allow them to maintain their stellar growth rate.

RVLV utilizes social media influence marketing/data analytics to find the next fashion trends and get trending products to their target audience – Mainly millennials and Gen Z females.

Just to compare how frequently they engage on social media compared with other fashion companies: 

Instagram:

Revolve: 17,422 posts, 5 m followers
Nordstrom: 6,608 posts, 3.4 m followers
Louis Vuitton: 5,870 posts, 47.3 m followers
Aritzia: 3,745 posts, 1.2 m followers
Lululemon: 3,254 posts, 3.9 m followers

TikTok:

Revolve: 309.7k followers, 2.9 m likes
Nordstrom: 22.3k followers, 1.7 m likes
Louis Vuitton: 1.4 m followers, 10 m likes
Aritzia: 28.7k followers, 28.8k likes
Lululemon: 256.2k followers, 2.6 m likes

Thesis: Why I am so bullish on Revolve

Proprietary Technology Infrastructure: Think of Revolve Group as the Amazon for Fashion. They utilize their proprietary technology, data science, influencer marketing, and brand ambassador program to become a lux fashion networking giant. The strategies they use are absolutely brilliant. For example, the majority of Revolve’s influencers and ambassadors do not get paid in cash, they receive store credit. Buy more clothes, sells more clothes! The most important thing with Revolve is no other American fashion company is engaging with their audience like this. They operate more like a European fashion company than an American fashion company. My ultra-bull case thesis is that Revolve becomes the Louis Vuitton of America.

Kendall Jenner Factor: In September 2021, Kendall Jenner was named the creative director for Forward, Revolve’s higher-end faster-growing luxury-focused division. FWRD sales were up 83% year-over-year in the subsequent three months. Jenner is a cash cow who makes about $611,000 (probably more) per Instagram post. From their latest Q4 earnings call, there are “special FWRD activations in the works,” for Kendall later this year.

Revolve Festival Returns in April: Revolve Festival is the “it” party in Coachella. After a two-year hiatus because of the pandemic, the invite-only party returns, which will increase greater brand awareness. They already have the cool factor. In September they had their first-ever New York Fashion Week runway show. “According to Tribe Dynamics, from September 6-11, the hashtag #revolvegallery generated $7.9 million in EMV (earned media value).” Just recently they hosted during Super Bowl weekend a two-day “Homecoming Weekend” event at the Pacific Design Center. The event was headlined by Justin Bieber and Drake. The guest list included the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio, Jeff Bezos, and Russell Wilson. You cannot get better than having a ton of A-list celebrities promoting your brand.

Oana Ruxandra: Revolve’s new board member is the Chief Digital Officer & Exec VP of Business Development for Warner Music Group. This is a tremendous asset to Revolve as she has a lot of connections with TikTok and Snapchat. Given her background, this could signal that Revolve will get into NFTs and/or metaverse. This gives Revolve another arsenal to better engage with their audience.

This isn’t a stay-at-home play. This isn’t a cash-burning speculative company. They are a legitimate cash-flowing business that utilizes innovative marketing techniques that other luxury apparel companies have yet to catch onto yet. There are tons of catalysts events for Revolve this year and next. I did not even mention they are opening their first store in March! “A lounge, cafe, bar, Instagram-bait photo walls… and a gym and wellness center.”

In order for retail to thrive in the future, they will need to drastically communicate with their consumers in a different way. This will require more experience-based retail and doubling down on technology. This is the Revolve business. Their core customers are not just buying clothes, they are getting a curated experience of an affluent lifestyle. The influencers are living that lifestyle, which creates a culturally significant brand.

Revolve is well-positioned in the luxury market for the long-term with several growth catalysts ahead. Our society is moving rapidly from offline to online and this shift is not a fad, it is a secular change. 22% of all luxury shopping is online in 2021. That number will reach 30% before 2030. Patient investors will be rewarded in the long run.

When I bought the stock two years ago, I viewed it as a good re-opening play. I didn’t imagine the success they would have during the pandemic. With live events returning, I expect the stock to soar. I am not selling, not for a while. Wall Street is sleeping on this company.

All these views are mine and do not represent financial advice, do your own research. I am not a financial advisor. This is for entertainment purposes only.

Consumers are spending like there is no tomorrow. One of the biggest beneficiaries is luxury fashion. That shouldn’t be surprising. If people were still buying designer clothes and handbags when everything was shut down, it seemed inevitable spending would increase as things open up. There are obvious reasons why luxury fashion benefits:

• People want to buy expensive clothing for special events and gatherings.
• People want to look good on their preferred social media platform.
• Even with supply chain issues, getting your hands on a designer dress or handbag is much easier than a Tesla, refrigerator, heater, etc.
• High-quality luxury brands have pricing power and can/will raise prices because consumers will pay for those prices.

A Chanel Handbag was going for $3,000-$4,000 in 2019. In 2022 it is now going for over $8,000.

“All the luxury industry is raising prices,” John Idol, the CEO of Capri Holdings (NYSE: CPRI), the parent company of Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo, and Versace. “We’ve seen absolutely no consumer resistance to any of the price increases that we have taken, and there will be more.”

This may disgust the average, middle-class consumer however there isn’t much they can do about it. There are still long lines outside stores like Louis Vuitton and Chanel. Certain consumers may become priced out however the core consumer for these products will still buy. Those consumers that are priced out usually will end up buying from a lesser-tier luxury brand, which is raising their prices as well.

Tapestry, Ralph Lauren and Capri Holdings have all recently raised sales outlook as 2022 and 2023 look like a good time for higher-end apparel companies. Demand will remain high as pandemic lockdowns get lifted. More social outings = Increased Demand.

My biggest holding is Revolve Group Inc, (NYSE: RVLV). If the price falls further due to weak earnings or the fear-driven market we are in currently, I may consider buying more shares, the first time in nearly two years.

Revolve Group has no physical retail presence. Having no stores lets them allocate their funds into advertising, inventory optimization, and operational efficiency. This gives them a leg up over their competitors with physical retail, which requires hiring employees and paying rent to lease commercial stores. In the future I think Revolve will actually need some sort of physical retail presence to help raise brand awareness and boost profits however, that is not the priority at this time.

The Revolve story is about social media and AI machine learning to better engage with their audience. Physical stores do not make much sense now since their brand is being built through influencers, special events, and festivals. This strategy is different from most other apparel companies but one that I think will be a winner and eventually be copied by other apparel companies.

The ultra bull-case thesis is that they become the first American Luxury Fashion company, being able to rival Louis Vuitton. Luxury fashion has been a European concept, it really hasn’t existed in the United States. Bernard Arnault once said, “if you control your distribution, you control your image.” A true luxury brand needs to aspire their audience to reach the top. This cannot be done when a product is discounted in outlet malls. It cheapens the brand. There is a reason why Rolex doesn’t sell “cheap” watches or why fancy restaurants have a dress code.

Since Revolve has no retail presence, its brand hasn’t suffered from massive discounting. It has an aspirational Los Angeles aesthetic feel with the cool factor. While the majority of other aspiring higher-end apparel companies operate in New York, their roots are in Los Angeles. They target a specific niche audience and operate more like a European fashion company than an American fashion company.

The question all high-end apparel companies have to ask themselves is how do you reach a mass audience without diminishing your brand value? Revolve is the only American company in their space doing this effectively. They do not just sell clothing, they are selling a cultural brand. Communication in how you reach your audience is just as important as the product itself.

The other catalyst for Revolve Group is that they appointed Oana Ruxandra to its board of directors. Here is a snippet from her biography:

Ruxandra is Chief Digital Officer & EVP, Business Development at Warner Music Group, where she oversees global digital partnerships and negotiations with a focus on exploring new forms of commercial innovation and creating new digital revenue opportunities. In recent years, Ruxandra’s team has led successful growth in emerging streaming platforms that have become Warner Music Group’s fastest-growing source of revenue by partnering with leading social media, gaming and connected fitness brands. She is also guiding the company’s expansion into other emerging digital market opportunities as the world of web3 evolves and more time is spent in the metaverse and with digital goods (e.g., NFTs).

REVOLVE Appoints Oana Ruxandra, Chief Digital Officer of Warner Music Group, to the Board of Directors

I see this as a potential sign that Revolve may get into NFTs and or the Metaverse. Ralph Lauren already got into the Metaverse last year and I could see Revolve proceeding soon. I see this being relevant for two main reasons. 1. Better able to connect and reach a Gen Z audience and 2. Premium luxury fashion needs to be more than just about selling products. They need to be able to create and sell experiences.

The Metaverse itself is about a digital experience. Revolve already has its own festival, the exclusive party inside Coachella. The Metaverse is another innovative way to connect to a younger audience. NFTs have value depending on who the creator is and what use case they have. Coachella recently launched an NFT marketplace which shows how they can be valued in a utilitarian way. They have an auction selling NFT keys that grant you lifetime access to Coachella. These keys show how they have value more than just aesthetically. The key provides an actual tangible real-life experience, which goes against the idea that NFTs are completely useless.

If the fundamental story remains, I will still hold my RVLV shares. If the stock price falls after earnings, I will strongly consider adding more shares. At this moment I have no plans to sell.

“I have been impressed with the urgency of doing. Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Being willing is not enough; we must do” – Leonardo da Vinci.

I recently opened up a position in Palantir (NYSE: PLTR). In terms of overall value, this company may become one of the most important by 2030. They are not your typical tech company. Unlike Google, Facebook, and Amazon, they aren’t using your data for targeted advertisements. The technology is being used to detect criminal activity and prevent terrorist attacks.

Investing in Palantir goes against my philosophy of “invest what you know,” however, I saw this as a rare opportunity to invest in a start-up company before its growth accelerates. The biggest question for many about Palantir is what do they do exactly? That’s a difficult question to answer. Here is a piece from the New York Times Magazine that might better help:

The company, Palantir Technologies, is named after the seeing stones in J.R.R. Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings.” Its two primary software programs, Gotham and Foundry, gather and process vast quantities of data in order to identify connections, patterns and trends that might elude human analysts. The stated goal of all this “data integration” is to help organizations make better decisions, and many of Palantir’s customers consider its technology to be transformative.

What Palantir does is a little more complex than unclogging a toilet. Essentially, Palantir’s software synthesizes the data that an organization collects. It could be five or six types of data; it could be hundreds. The challenge is that each type of information — phone numbers, trading records, tax returns, photos, text messages — is often formatted differently from the others and siloed in separate databases. Building virtual pipelines, Palantir engineers merge all the information into a single platform. They work quickly. According to Jose Arrieta, who was H.H.S.’s chief information officer until two months ago, Palantir merged around two billion data elements related to the Covid-19 outbreak in less than three weeks. Once the data has been integrated, it can be presented in the form of tables, graphs, timelines, heat maps, artificial-intelligence models, histograms, spider diagrams and geospatial analysis. It is a digital panopticon, and having sat through several Palantir demos, I can report that the interface is impressive — the search results are strikingly elegant and easy to understand.

Does Palantir See Too Much?

Palantir’s technology has been credited with saving its financial institution customers hundreds of millions of dollars, being used to detect Chinese spyware on the Dalai Lama’s computer, thwarting Pakistani suicide bombers, and unraveling Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme. Its customers have included the CDC, police departments in America and abroad, and large corporations like JPMorgan and Home Depot. Palantir even sued the US Army in 2016 to force it to consider using its intelligence software after the Army chose to go with its own. Palantir won the suit, and then it won an $800 million contract.

Everything you need to know about Palantir, the secretive company coming for all your data

So why did I invest in Palantir? Here are a few reasons why:

#1 Sticky Product – The growing list of clients shows a. their software works and b. they have high switching costs. At this time, Palantir has no direct competition, and government agencies trust their software. This sounds similar to Intuitive Surgical (NASDAQ: ISRG). A company with little to no competition. I wrote about ISRG in a previous blog post: they have a monopoly on minimally invasive robotic surgeries. They are the leader today and will likely be the leader a decade from now. There is competition ahead however this industry will continue to grow rapidly. As innovation and technology improve, the number of procedures assisted by robotic surgeries will increase. The population is getting older, which means demand will continue. For ISRG, their da Vinci systems can cost anywhere between $500,000 to $2.5 million. It requires a lot of training and education for doctors and the medical staff to use their systems. For Palantir, their clients pay $10 million to $100 million annually. Every client requires an onsite implementation team with high-touch installation and customization. Clients for both companies are likely to stay because it would be so time-consuming and costly to go with a competitor. The technology would have to be substantially better for them to switch.

#2 Importance – Palantir’s software is being used to thwart terrorist attacks, detect money laundering schemes, prevent sex trafficking, etc… It would be hard to see this company go under, given how much they are tied into deterring crime and terrorism. Palantir is to data analysis tool as to what Boeing is to Civilian aircraft and aircraft engines. Like it or not, Palantir’s software is being used by the FBI, CIA, Department of Defense, Homeland Security, NSA, Marine Corp, Army, Navy, local police departments, etc. With their technology being a. more widely used and b. significantly better than anything else on the market, it would be hard to see the government allow this company to fold as they essentially have a monopoly in the government sector.

3. Growth – Palantir was founded in 2003, but its entrance into commercial businesses (B2B) is more recent. The government contracts are what pays the bills right now, but the corporate clients (big and small) could accelerate its growth. If Palantir can find a B2C product (which they don’t have and might never will), its market cap could be over $1 trillion. For this to happen, they need strong leadership, culture, and the most talented software engineers in the world. Check, Check, and Check!

4. Misunderstood – Companies like Palantir are focused on building their infrastructure and making innovative products rather than returning that money to shareholders. In the short term, they are not worried about generating profits. Palantir reinvests heavily, which makes their earnings look artificially low. This is not good for the stock price in the short, but if Palantir’s reinvestments pay off, it can create outsized returns in the future.

Palantir gets a lot of notoriety for working with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.) I.C.E. has two divisions in Homeland Security Investigations (H.S.I) and Enforcement and Removal Operations, (E.R.O). The fact is Palantir had a contract with H.S.I, which is responsible for cross-border criminal investigations, and not E.R.O., which is responsible for interior civil immigration enforcement, including deportation and detention of undocumented immigrants. These controversial agencies need resources, and if Palantir ended their contracts due to bad PR, what company would service them?

To keep this short, many people, including the media, have an ideological-driven narrative, focusing on some things and ignoring other things. There is no actual intellectual debate or discourse. Yes, Palantir’s technology is used to kill terrorists. Both political parties in our country, Democrats and Republicans, want to stop the bad guys. If this doesn’t work for your moral conscious, you perhaps should not invest in their stock. Apple, which I think is a great company, has been accused of breaking Chinese Labor laws and exploiting Chinese factory workers. These are decisions you have to make when evaluating a companies environmental, social and corporate governance.

5. Transformative CEO – When you invest in a company you are very much investing in the leadership in power to execute on their vision and plan. Remove Jeff Bezos from Amazon or Elon Musk from Tesla. Are these companies still as profitable? There is no way to measure this. Alex Karp borders on an eccentric genius to a paranoid mad man. He once said, “the only time I’m not thinking about Palantir is when I’m swimming, practicing Qigong or during sexual activity.” It is safe to say a lot of the most successful CEOs of companies are not quite normal. Only time will tell if Karp is the next Steve Jobs or Papa John. He’s not your typical CEO of a not-so-typical company tech startup from Silicon Valley. For me, that is what makes buying the stock so intriguing.

Palantir presents a tremendous opportunity for investors willing to take a risk and look foolish now but potentially look like a genius in the future. I recommend being long, risky assets. When a companies growth doesn’t happen until 3-10 years from now, the numbers do not make much sense today. A DCF model with Palantir makes a lot of assumptions that seem absurd when viewed through the lens of the present, but be clear in the future. Palantir follows the same model as Uber and Airbnb, focusing on long-term and sandbagging profits today. This is the strategy Amazon used to grow into the behemoth they are today.

What separates Palantir from other startups is that I view them as more intrinsically valuable for what they do and what their technology provides. There are stocks that I love that are much easier to explain with simpler business models. With Palantir, there is so much depth stacked on top of each other. I view the company as a unique unicorn that cannot be closely replicated. They help solve problems that we do not even know exist today. Once these problems surface, Palantir’s software becomes infinitely more valuable. There is a saying, “data is the new oil,” and with Palantir’s ability to synthesize data, they may become on par with Google and Microsoft. I am holding for the long-term. The Tesla-like growth in the future is just too enticing to pass up.

The market has been painful to watch for the past couple of months.

REALLY PAINFUL the past couple of weeks.

70% of Nasdaq stocks have fallen at least 20% from their recent high, 50% of Nasdaq stocks are down 40% or more!

This isn’t the first time the market has gone down and it certainly won’t be the last time. The truth is this is the cost of becoming wealthy. To go through times like this when you see your portfolio value eviscerated in weeks.

Imagine holding bitcoin when it was $1.

Imagine holding Amazon when the idea of selling items online was considered a novelty.

There was no consensus among experts, analysts, even internet trolls to buy bitcoin in 2011.  

There were no waves of screaming buys when Amazon was trading below 100. 

Those that got rich went against the market. They went against the crowd.

Times like this are the best time to buy stocks when all the “experts” start telling you to sell. Netflix for example had a great earnings report in October. It had a positive earnings report Thursday, but the stock price fell over 20% in one day!

Now you hear a lot of analysts/experts downgrading/selling the stock, the same people who were increasing the price target to above 700. They are all running towards the exit at the same time! Call me crazy, but I do not think much has changed with Netflix since October. The fundamental story for solid companies like Netflix, Amazon, Google, etc.… remains the same.

The only way to buy solid companies at a fair price is during times like this. The risk level seems higher but that is only on a surface level. For example, if you have a high conviction that Lemonade will do well 3-10 years from now and believe the stock price will be 600-700, it doesn’t matter if you buy the stock at 60, 50, 40, 30, or 20. You will still make a lot of money if you buy and, this is the hard part, hold. If you wait until there is less “risk,” and buy the stock after it has a consensus buy rating, you will likely end up buying the stock when it is between 200-600.

In the above example, one investor might or might not get rich and might or might not make a decent-sized profit, the other investor will build serious wealth.

Long-term wealth building is a psychological exercise of patience and controlling your emotions. If you can master the psychology of investing, as a long-term investor, you can build wealth. This is very easy to say but extremely difficult to follow. Even after Netflix fell 20% it can still fall a lot further from here. Nobody wants to hear that there is more pain on the horizon but a sound investing strategy requires logic and common sense, not emotional selling or buying.

Making a scientific analogy, the market is in a constant state of disorder, randomness, and uncertainty. Entropy is the measure of the disorder of a system. It is an extensive property of a thermodynamic system, which means its value changes depending on the amount of matter that is present. 

It is impossible to predict the stock market because there are so many variable factors beyond our control and constantly changing. In general, if you have an optimistic view of the U.S economy in the long-term, you probably will have a favorable view of stocks, meaning stocks on a broad basis will go up, as it has always been doing. If you have an unfavorable view of the economy, you are likely predicting market crashes and hoarding lots of gold.  

As of this present moment, based on sentiment we are headed towards a recession and stocks will fall off a cliff. No matter how good the economy is doing, a recession is not extremely improbable. Every year there is a 10-15% chance of it happening. That sounds horrible however I do not believe the Federal Reserve, the legislative or executive branch of our government has any incentive to allow this to happen, meaning they eventually enact policies that will prevent stocks from crashing. And even if a recession does happen, in the long run, we should be fine. 

Most predictions of a stock crash and doomsday scenarios are proven to be wrong. Remember Y2K or the 2012 Maya Apocalypse? Igor Panarin once predicted the U.S would disintegrate, he even created a map about the new global order.

The 2020 Pandemic was indeed a black swan event however the global infrastructure is stable enough for us to overcome it. That doesn’t mean stocks will stop falling. They could have much further to go down, which means more pain ahead.

So why do I keep holding?

Two main reasons: In the long run I believe the stock market will go up and the U.S. economy will grow. Why overcomplicate things? Secondly, from everything I have learned and been taught, it is impossible to time the market accurately. If you do time the market correctly, a lot of luck was involved. Not only do you have to sell at the right time, but you also have to buy back in at the right time as well making it even more improbable and risky you get it right twice.

From most economic models, our economy is in a healthy state. I will weather the storm, continue to buy high-quality companies at discounted prices, sit on my hands and do nothing – Even if the stock market falls further. This is what I believe is the ultimate challenge of investing. Holding during times like these. I don’t blame anyone for selling, but my goal is to build wealth. Jeff Bezos once asked Warren Buffett: “You’re the second richest guy in the world. Your investment thesis is so simple. Why don’t more people just copy you?” Buffett replied, “Because nobody wants to get rich slow.”

I wish everyone a calm state of mind during these times of intense market fluctuation. We need less judgment and more caring. The best thing to happen to the stock market was this weekend. It provides everyone time to reflect and think. Do I sell? Do I hold? Do I buy? Things aren’t always as bad as they may seem. It is important to take a deep breath and not panic. Best of luck on your investing journey.

As the overall stock market is holding up quite well right now, smaller Nasdaq stocks are getting crushed! 36% of the stocks in the Nasdaq are down at least 50% from their 52-week high! This seems like a bloodbath for most investors. I understand why many investors would be fearful to invest right now or in the next few months. Why invest in such a risky environment? Is it time to sell all my stocks?

My investing philosophy is to scoop up high-quality, or potential high-quality stocks and hold them for a long time. This seems like the perfect time to buy stocks, as I would rather buy stocks near their 52-week low than their 52-week high. I want to warn anyone reading this: stocks can continue to fall. Amazon at one point in its history lost 90% of its value in two years. For those that are patient, great things can happen to those that wait. When you invest in high-quality companies that you are willing to hold for 5-10 years or longer, you will get wealthy. Investors that bought Amazon at the peak and lost 90% of their investment are up now (if they still hold the stock) at least 1,400% of their investment.

I want to make clear, these are investments in companies that I think will thrive 5-10 years from now. These are not trades. I have to fundamentally be excited by the story of the company and its financial outlook in the future. I could never justify investing in AMC because they have $5.4 billion in long-term debt and in an industry that is drastically shrinking. If you were an entrepreneur, would you invest in a start-up company wanting to build movie theaters? I would be highly skeptical and thus could never justify investing any significant amount in the stock.

A lot of traders made a killing when AMC spiked last year. I missed out however, I have a long-term horizon. If you were lucky to get in on ACM I would guess you made a significant short-term capital gain, the keyword being “short.” Short-term capital gains are taxed as ordinary income, which is much higher than long-term capital gains. Investors have to remember fees and taxes are silent killers in wealth-building. With AMC, many traders simply get lucky. Do they have an investment philosophy or process that can be replicated to find the next AMC and get in and out at the right time? For the majority of traders, I would not think so as that explains why so many of them lose money.

One of my favorite Warren Buffett quotes is “if you aren’t willing to own a stock for 10 years, don’t even think about owning it for 10 minutes.” Another is, “our favorite holding period is forever.” The best advice from what I have learned from greats like Buffett is that if you want to get rich, you can sell, if you want to get wealthy, you have no reason to sell. You hold on. These are 10 stocks which I feel are a. high quality and b. beaten up creating a potentially attractive buying price.

MercadoLibre – Investing in MercadoLibre is the equivalent of buying shares of Amazon 5-10 years ago. Imagine if you had a time machine and you could do that? With MercadoLibre you have more geopolitical risk than American businesses but there are so many similarities with Amazon, it is difficult to ignore. The total addressable market is gigantic and both have profit-generating businesses outside of their marketplace. With MELI, I ignore its insane P/E Ratio, just like I did with Amazon, and look at its Price to Sales Ratio, which is a lot more reasonable. I would be shocked in 3-5 years if MELI is not trading where Amazon’s stock price sits at right now – about 3,000-3,500.

Alibaba – Alibaba and many of the high-growth Chinese tech names are at buy-levels. If you can stomach the geopolitical risk, they are worth a look into. My thesis with baba and a lot of these companies on the list are similar. If you liked BABA at 200, you should LOVE it at 130, even more at 120! With how large of a presence Alibaba has in China I do not believe the stock is priced to go down to zero. The business is fundamentally strong and I believe the Chinese government has no incentive to tear it down.

Sea Limited – If you haven’t noticed, I am bullish on the e-commerce sector for the next decade. E-commerce is not a trend, it is a fundamental change in consumer behavior. So it should be no surprise I picked another e-commerce company.

The Honest Company – Perhaps the least upside out of all these stocks, but maybe the safest. This is a recession-proof business. You cannot go wrong with diapers, skincare, cleaning products, and makeup. This is the Procter & Gamble for millennials. While this isn’t necessarily the next Tesla, I would be surprised if this stock isn’t well above its 52-week high of 23.88 once they start eeking out a profit, projected by late 2022 or early 2023. From my observation the business model is sound. A lot of the scaling and growth issues happened before this company become public.

Block/Paypal – These are two separate companies however they are in the same space and the two stalwarts in the fintech sector. Top Financial Apps: 1. Cash App, 2. PayPal 3. Venmo. For diversification purposes, I endorse splitting 50% of an equity position on both Block and Paypal. If I had to guess both companies will be significantly worth more in the future but by diversifying, you protect yourself from single-stock risk. These are two well-known companies so there is no need to go in-depth in each of them. Jack Dorsey has stepped down from Twitter so he should be able to devout more of his time with Block. PayPal is a high-quality company that has been around since 1998. They aren’t going anywhere.

Mind Medicine/COMPASS Pathway/ATAI Life Sciences – The biotech sector is a bit like the Amazon Rainforest. Unpredictable and extreme volatility. This isn’t for the faint of heart and will test you as a long-term investor. The psychedelic sector is down significantly based on no real material news. Clinical-stage biotech moves towards a different beat at times, especially when there are no trial results or FDA rulings. For long-term investors in this sector, massive swings based on non-fundamental news are just noise in the background.

Spotify – I do not own this stock but it has reached a price where it has become intriguing. If Netflix and Google are the kings of video streaming, Spotify is the king of audio streaming. They leapfrogged Pandora and haven’t looked back. With Spotify, you just have to follow the money. It is an ad-revenue play. Follow the money by following the eyeballs, or this case the ears. In terms of high-growth stocks in their early stages, Spotify may be one of the best. They have Joe Rogan, paid $60 million to Alex Cooper and her podcast “Call Her Daddy.” I see Spotify on a similar course to the next stock I will mention.

NetFlix – I have always thought NetFlix was the weakest among the FANG stocks but I underestimated how well the company is managed. Subscribers follow good content and Netflix has proven they can consistently produce a lot of good and varied content for different audiences. Once you think Netflix is on the decline they shell out the Squid Game, which became a global phenomenon. At some point, you cannot credit this to luck when they consistently produce popular original content. Of course, there is a ton of competition in this space however I don’t see Disney+ or any other video streaming service being able to churn as quickly hit show after hit show as Netflix has done.

Lemonade – Timely advice for investors of this company: Scaling growth is not a linear process. It will take time. There will be road bumps on the way. Lemonade offers pet insurance in 34 states, renters insurance in 28 states, condo insurance in 25 states, homeowners insurance in 23 states, and car insurance in 1 state. What does that mean? They have a lot of markets to enter into, and I am not even talking about other countries yet! While pet and renters insurance has been growing at a quick yet steady pace, they are just getting into car insurance. That all changed when they acquired Metromile in November 2021. Metromile is already in 8 states, so Lemonade has now acquired its state certifications in those states. For Lemonade to operate, they need certification in each state they operate in. To do this organically would take a lot of time although, by acquiring Metromile, they sped up that process. The future outlook of this company has never been brighter and is certainly something to get excited about.

Coinbase – If you do not believe in cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and NFTs having much value you can stop reading. If you think they have staying power, Coinbase may be the best stock to invest in without actually buying cryptocurrencies. Think of Coinbase as the Goldman Sachs of crypto. Coinbase makes money when there is more trading activity. If you believe interest in cryptocurrencies will permanently die down, you shouldn’t buy this stock. I believe in the bull-thesis for Coinbase, especially more so since they are launching an NFT marketplace soon. If their marketplace can provide a better user experience than OpenSea it will see its revenue soar to record-highs. With Coinbase it is not so much if you find value in NFTS, it is if the market as a whole will. Pokémon cards for example are a decade older than bitcoin, and the value for certain rare cards has skyrocketed. The estimated value of a PSA 10 Base Set Holo Shadowless Charizard is over $300,000.